Talking Back to The New York Times’ ADHD Myth-Mongering

New York Times ADHD

The New York Times has recently published a parade of hit pieces on ADHD in its opinion section. This merits calling out.

As a veteran print journalist who grew up respecting The New York Times, I’ve been horrified to see such blatant anti-science fearmongering. I canceled my subscription after decades. I did this partly as protest and partly because I no longer trust the paper’s editorial judgment.

Yet I retain my subscription to the Washington Post. That paper has an excellent history of balanced, compassionate reporting on ADHD. Will it survive new ownership and the online competition for web traffic (and ad dollars) by any means necessary? We shall see.

My previous post addressed the latest salvo in The New York Times’ war on ADHD: The New York Times’ Unnatural Opinions on ADHD.  Below, I share my friend’s excellent Letter to the Editor regarding one piece, in particular, “A Natural Fix for A.D.H.D. – The New York Times

First, Some Background

For years, the paper has treated ADHD as a juicy “clickbait pinata”: Bash it and all the web-traffic goodies fall out!

Before that, it was pediatric bipolar disorder.

Consider the particularly noxious front-page “10,000 Toddlers Treated for ADHD!”  Defying ethical journalistic practice, reporter Alan Swarz sneaked into a CDC event at the Carter Center in Georgia, and then proceeded to mangle the information in order to get a front-page story.  (When I was in the newsroom, we called that “hot-dogging” and it was not tolerated.)

I responded to it here:  Pt. I: The Truth Behind “10,000 Toddlers Medicated for ADHD”

ADHD is a Legitimate Medical Issue

ADHD is a legitimate diagnosis that remains underdiagnosed and poorly managed even when it’s diagnosed. It is wreaking havoc for millions of people in the U.S. and worldwide.

You would not know that from reading this reportage and these egregious opinion pieces. With the latter, each comes from a fringe non-expert with better PR placement than an understanding of ADHD. Most are peddling a book and a “contrarian position” on ADHD, which the editors lazily assume provides balance. Obviously, neither cares who they hurt in the process.

These non-experts exploit public ignorance and fears about ADHD for their own gain. Surely that behavior features prominently in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM).  I am not being sarcastic.

“Nomadic People Don’t Get To Write Screenplays”

Now, here is my friend Dotty’s excellent Letter to the Editor, written in response to A Natural Fix for A.D.H.D. – The New York Times.

As far as I know, the paper did not publish her letter. That’s why I publish it here.

Dotty, who has ADHD and whose husband has ADHD—both diagnosed in their 30s—and who has four young children with likely ADHD, writes:

I’m thankful Dr. Richard Friedman laid out the truth about ADHD’s biological roots: It’s something we’re born with. It’s related to brain function and structure.

However, his prescription to “treat” our ADHD was to relieve our “boredom”—comparing us to a nomadic Kenyan tribe who needs the stimulation to find food and a mate.

There’s only one problem: Nomadic tribal peoples don’t get to write screenplays.

They also don’t have dental care and strong teeth. Their kids don’t get antibiotics, or a good education, or even clothing. (There’s no mention of the infant mortality rates. Or how long the adults live. Or even of the smell that they endure every day.)

These tribes live every day in “crisis mode,” searching for the next thing that will feed them—just for that day!

New York Times ADHD

Oh, but you don’t want us to actually become nomads; you just want us to be “stimulated” by doing things like running our own businesses.

The only problem is that, according to Forbes magazine, 8 out of 10 new businesses fail! Nomads and entrepreneurs don’t make their kill every day, Dr. Friedman.

I’m sorry, but I’m tired of living in crisis mode.

Adults with untreated ADHD typically have major issues with self-regulation and self-control.

That includes things like keeping track of bills, holding down a job, making sure your kids get fed in the middle of the night when you’d rather sleep. Since many of us can’t do these things consistently without treatment, we’re constantly running around in a crisis.

Plus, ADHDers—and their spouses—typically have stress-induced diseases by middle age because their lives are constantly in chaos!

You correctly say that we’re born with it, yet you disparage treatments that can regulate these symptoms? I’m sorry, you’re not living with the condition, and I am.

[Gina’s note: We do not know, in fact, if Friedman does or does not have ADHD. In my experience, the most vocal critics of ADHD have it themselves and have something to sell.]

I don’t want to worry about running out of baby formula because we have no money. I don’t want to live day-to-day with “stimulation seeking” activity, with only the fear of hunger driving my neurons.

I want a peaceful life, with happy memories made with my kids. I want to make long-term plans for financial prosperity, and work to reach them. I want to write screenplays, stage plays, songs, and novels. Before I do that, I want to raise my young children and enjoy their antics—not run around like a chicken with my head cut off.

I’m tired of having the “change your life instead of getting on meds” discussion about this REAL disability.

If we were born without hands instead of with under-performing D3 receptors in our brains, NO ONE would tell us to change our career goals. Instead, medical teams would work tirelessly to make sure that we could reach our dreams, whether we had fingers or not.

That’s what ADHD researchers and clinicians do, and that’s who I’m going to listen to. According to your website, your specialty is depression. I’m not taking your prescription for my “boredom,” because you’re not a specialist in my condition.

Thank you, Dotty!

 

5 thoughts on “Talking Back to The New York Times’ ADHD Myth-Mongering”

  1. That you so much for posting this, Gina! What is needed is a mainstream denouncement of NYT’s absence of editorial integrity in this matter. Being an expert in one field doesn’t qualify you to speak with authority in another. NYT’s journalistic integrity was compromised when they employed the half-truth that the author of the article on ADHD is an “expert”.

    1. Hi Michael,

      I hate to say it, as a print journalist, but the NYT lost its journalistic integrity a long time ago, especially in the area of reporting on psychiatric issues.

      My sources tell me that the editor behind much of this has retired.

      Unfortunately, by now, the NYT has learned that sensational stories and opinions about NYT are lucrative clickbait. I doubt they will stop.

      The best we can do is cancel our subscriptions, with a hand-written note, and stop frequenting its website.

      The Washington Post, for example, has never relied on drumming on web visitors by writing defamatory stories about ADHD. Instead, it has always produced balanced stories, and early on.

      best,
      g

  2. Thank you for publishing this, and thanks also to Dotty for her thoughtfully written letter. She has perfectly captured how many of us feel when we are lectured by those who have no idea of what our lives and struggles are like.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay in Touch!
Ride the ADHD Roller Coaster
Without Getting Whiplash!
Receive Gina Pera's award-winning blog posts and news of webinars and workshops.
P.S. Your time and privacy—Respected.
No e-mail bombardment—Promised.
No Thanks!
close-link