Welcome to post 5 in the series: Gene-Testing to Inform ADHD Therapy.
This week’s theme is: You can’t stay warm in the winter, even if your heating system is functioning perfectly, if your house has are air leaks, there is no insulation in the attic, and the windows arern’t caulked.
Part 1 provides an overview to the topic of genetic testing as it relates to ADHD medication-response.
Part 2 shares testing results for my husband and me, along with my husband’s personal reactions to our disparate genes.
Part 3 defines what is meant by the term genotyping test. Briefly, it’s a test that informs you of your genetic particulars. Specifically for our purposes in this blog series, it refers to tests that identify which variants of the drug-response genes known to be associated with ADHD medications that you have.
Part 4 explains how, when, and why this data might prove helpful, delving more deeply into the topics of pharmacokinetics (what your body does to the medication) and pharmacodynamics (what the medication does to the body).
The Limits of Genotyping
By Dr. Goat
Consider genotyping as one part of the puzzle. Think of it, for example, in terms of a house inspection that looks only into how well the heating system works:
• How efficient is the furnace?
• Are the radiators clear or clogged?
• Are the heating ducts insulated or leaky?
Keep in mind, though: These factors all relate to the heating system only— which is simply one aspect of what it takes to keep the house warm. We who grew up with hard Canadian winters know: The heating system is only one part of the equation. In this metaphor, the heating system is the information you receive from genotyping.
The Limits of Genotyping to Inform ADHD Drug Therapy
Consider other factors beyond the heating system, to name a few:
- Wall and window insulation
- Outside temperature
- The occupants’ preferred indoor temperature
Obviously, these factors also affect the desired goal (a comfortable inside temperature for the house’s occupants).
In other words, you might know that the heating system is working well. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that the house’s indoor temperature will be comfortable. You have to consider the other factors mentioned above (insulation, outside temperature, etc.).
The same applies to genotyping data: they will tell you how well one part of the system is working: the drug-response genes. But that’s not the whole story.
There is a huge gap between
- How the proteins produced by those genes function at the molecular level, and
- The final therapeutic effect on large numbers of cells in the brain
The involvement of other factors comes into play, including:
- Co-existing conditions (including not only psychiatric conditions but also cardiovascular issues, diabetes, chronic pain, etc.)
- Health status
- Other lifestyle factors
Also keep in mind: We have a large body of published literature that tells us about response rates to the various medications used to treat ADHD. This information comes into play, too. For more than a decade, I have taken a stimulant medication listed in the “Consider this last” column of my Harmonyx testing for ADHD medications. You’ll learn more about that when I personally address my application of test results in the next, and last, post in this series.
Does this mean that it isn’t useful to know about your specific drug-response? No. It is absolutely useful to understand, at least in part, the performance of the crucial machinery that affects your ability to process and respond to a drug.
Bottom-Line Message: Three Scenarios
Given all that, I’ll repeat and expand upon my take on the three scenarios as to when and how to use results from drug-response genotyping:
- When you’re just getting started with medication;
- When you’ve been on medication a while but aren’t happy with the results and/or side
- When you are considering adding a medication.
Let’s examine these scenarios one by one.
Scenario 1: You’re just getting started with medication
You have been diagnosed with ADHD and want to proceed with drug therapy. Genotyping data can help you decide:
- The Order in which you want to try medications
- The Dosage you might want to start with
Dosage is tricky because it’s not a yes-no decision. If you’re a poor metabolizer for a so-called active drug, you are likely to need to start with a lower dosage, but … how low? Frequently—or perhaps even typically—no one really knows. It’s not at all clear how one should pick a starting dose.
In my opinion, it’s basically a crapshoot.
Take the example of Strattera. The peak blood concentration reached by poor metabolizers is five times higher than normal. Therefore, to be on the safe side, you might want to start with half the normal dose. Even then, this dose might still too high (thereby potentially triggering side effects) or even too low to get a beneficial effect (an important factor to consider).
Why start at only half the dose rather than 5 times lower? The rationale has to do with the gap between what genotyping tells us and all the other factors that affect how you might respond.
So you may well ask,
what’s all this fuss
In other words, starting at half the dosage is sort of a neutral bet: You may not get much beneficial effect because the dose is too low, but you minimize the risk of side effects.
If you observe few or no side effects, you might then want to consider increasing the dosage, especially if you’re not sure you are getting beneficial effects. You would continue to increase until you start noticing side effects, at which point you might want to back down some. (Ideally, the prescribing physician will be using rating scales and other methods to help you track progress and side effects.)
Gina’s book already makes that recommendation about medications in general: to “start low and titrate slow.” (Titration being the process of gradually adjusting the dose of a medication until optimal results are reached). So you may well ask, what’s all this fuss about genotyping?
The benefit lies in providing a rationale as to where to start in your dosage, as well as which medication to begin with. Genotyping will help inform those decisions, instead of starting blind as to how your body is likely to metabolize and react to the drug.
Scenario 2: You are having problems with a specific drug
Perhaps you’ve been taking a medication for a while, are finding the side effects intolerable, and want to try a different medication. These side effects might, in fact, be manifesting because your dosage is too high. This might be because you have a variant of the CYP2D6 gene that confers slow metabolism of an “active” drug, such Strattera.
Knowing this fact might help you justify a decision to simply lower the dosage (instead of switching to another medication altogether). This allows you to continue with a drug that might otherwise be well suited to you.
This point is important, because the universe of medications suitable for ADHD is quite limited. Before discarding a drug, we should first address factors that might explain its poor performance. Perhaps a simple dosage adjustment to match your biology is all that is required.
Moreover, because a single gene can influence the effectiveness of multiple drugs (e.g., CYP2D6), it is entirely possible you might have similar side effects with another drug for the same reason you originally ditched the first one: you’re a poor metabolizer for both.
Case in point: One of the main stimulant medications on the market, namely, amphetamine (the active ingredient in Adderall), is also processed by CYP2D6, so whatever variant of this gene you have will likely affect how you respond to both Adderall and Strattera. That’s why knowing the profile of your drug response genes is clearly helpful.
Scenario 3: You are considering adding a drug
This is basically a variant of point #1, except with the added complication that you are already taking one or more drugs.
This is a common scenario. Most adults with ADHD have at least one co-existing condition, such as anxiety, depression, and bi-polar disorder.
Because drugs can interact with each other to the detriment of all—and there is often little data in the literature on these interactions—selecting an additional drug and determining its dosage is even trickier.
Knowing that the additional drug is metabolized by one of the drug-response genes is helpful, because it is possible for drugs to “gang-up”—thus overwhelming the body’s ability to metabolize them, with all sorts of consequences.
As an example, if you knowing up-front that you are a slow metabolizer due to a single gene involved in metabolism of both drugs, that might help you assess the safety and dosage with which to begin the second drug.
As I’ve emphasized above, many factors beyond genetics influence the outcome of drug therapy. Many of these factors remain unknown to us, such that we are operating in partial darkness in the best of circumstances.
For these reasons, drug selection and dosage decisions will necessarily be imperfect because we simply don’t have all the information necessary to even approach optimality. That underscores the importance of being conservative and cautious in selecting ADHD drugs and their dosage.
This is especially true for a condition such as ADHD because of its chronic nature: With ADHD, you are likely to be taking a drug for a long time; because the range of available drugs is limited, it is crucial to carefully evaluate a drug before discarding it.
Don’t feel bad if you get the sense that ADHD medication treatment is a seat-of-the-pants decision-making exercise—because that is mostly what it is. Published research tells us a great deal about medication response for large groups of people with ADHD but less so for any one individual. Fortunately, genotyping of drug response genes means you can now do the individual decision-making with a bit more light thrown unto this dark landscape.
Check in at the ADHD Roller Coaster next week for the final post in this series.
We welcome your comments and questions, especially if you are a ADHD-specialist physician with experience in this issue.
—Gina Pera and Dr. Goat